The secret to scaling is stopping
Why myself and my co-founders of a delivery company spent months doing deliveries ourselves, and how that’s the opposite of what most scaling advice tells you.
Brand new to the site? I suggest you start here
Why myself and my co-founders of a delivery company spent months doing deliveries ourselves, and how that’s the opposite of what most scaling advice tells you.
The story of the Christmas I wrote a cheque I couldn’t cash — and what it taught me about the difference between “tight” and “broke.”
We tried dynamic pricing. It made perfect sense on paper. Here’s why we killed it.
Everyone’s worried about AI taking jobs. They’re asking the wrong question. Most of what we call work — synthesis, comparison, formatting, gathering data from six places — isn’t thinking. It’s assembly. And we’ve been doing it with the most expensive tool in the company: our brains. AI didn’t take my investor reports or financial prep. It freed me from work that was never meant for a human in the first place.
I haven’t touched code in 25 years. I just built six production apps that replaced subscriptions, cut hours of weekly work, and kept our dev team focused on the platform. The excuse that you’re not technical just expired.
Our CEO became the lead sales person. Our CPO codes features himself. I’ve done deliveries when we were underwater. Every one of us has been the hero. And it’s killing us. This isn’t ego. It’s passion. And passion without lanes is chaos. Heroes can’t scale. Cogs can.
It took us five offsites to figure it out. Too much agenda. No strategy before. Momentum that evaporates the day you leave. This time we kept the team two extra days after the sessions ended. Just working together. It built culture and solved follow-through in one move.
I asked a hotel staff member for a larger bowl. He brought me one. The next morning it was already at my seat. Every morning after that, same thing. Nobody asked. He just remembered. That’s customer service. The small thing that costs nothing but signals everything.
Founders defer pay, vacations, health, family, friendships. Everything. In the hopes it eventually works out. But the deferral rarely gets repaid. Fail, and you lose it all. Succeed, and you become an executive managing what you built. Either way, you become the thing you left.
We hired a team to manage routes, assign bonuses, and call couriers. It worked so well that leadership had no idea. We thought the system was running. It wasn’t. People were running it. By the time we realized, the manual process was baked into our DNA.
Growth is slow, so we chase the next opportunity. But growth is slow because we never commit long enough to see if the plan works. The distraction causes the problem that justifies more distraction. We have to protect the plan long enough to know if it actually works.
We wanted a merchant live in two weeks. Their team wasn’t ready, so we built around them. They launched. It broke. Now we maintain that feature forever. Every shortcut we took to close faster became work we owned forever. The fix is patience.
I’ve been at zero. Put my own money in to cover payroll. So I know the mistake most founders make when they get there: they keep operating like nothing changed. When you’re broke, there’s only one question: does this put money in the bank this week?
Two weeks ago, I shared our 2026 plan. Six Canadian cities. Clear targets. The next day, an enterprise customer asked us to open seven American cities. Our CEO is in Denver right now. The goal doesn’t change. The path just got a lot more interesting.
Team members. Investors. Advisors. The Board. Everyone suggests ways to squeeze more from existing customers. Subscriptions. Surcharges. Box size fees. Every idea makes sense on a spreadsheet. We keep saying no. The discipline isn’t saying no once. It’s saying no every quarter when someone new brings the same idea with different math.
We spent $20K a month on marketing. Got 700 downloads. Ten deliveries. Seven customers. My cofounder wanted to kill it. I wanted data. Here’s how we structured the uncertainty instead of pretending we knew the answer.
A customer wanted us in six cities. So we opened six cities. Here’s what a year of bleeding taught us about the difference between following and pace-setting.Retry
Building custom software for your exact needs is now faster and cheaper than subscribing to platforms built for everyone. Generic software is dying because you can build exactly what you need in days, not months—and keep it only as long as it’s useful.
When you’re trying to double revenue, every initiative looks promising. You can chase 50 different opportunities and convince yourself they all make sense. You’ll waste months testing marginal improvements while your core business stays mediocre
AI isn’t a destination but a service layer that will fade into the background of how business works.
With AI and operations, your answer will only be as good as your own experience.
No one is perfect and at the pace that startups operate at, mistakes happen often. What makes startups completely unique is that mistakes often mean progress, they mean you are testing the boundaries, trying new things.
Senior team updates are important. Strike that. Senior team updates are VERY important. Something of this importance should not be left to automation.
There is a cost of doing business — any business — and that cost always comes in the form of dilution.
I’ve never really thought about what “being” an entrepreneur means. I figured it was pretty simple — you are one or your aren’t.
Being a leader of a startup — especially in any operations role — is one of the hardest things to do properly in business.
The most important thing that leads to startup success (even more-so than luck, timing, hard work and persistence) is solving a problem in a different way from competitors.
There are two business types: one you control and one that controls you. A co-founder who survived the pandemic and thrived by managing conservative cashflow and growing from profit shares insights. Unlike many overly reliant on investments, he prioritized sustainable, self-sufficient growth, illustrating the essence of true business control.